Over the past 20 years, RPI has carried out hundreds of studies on all major segments of the oil and gas industry of Russia, CIS and Eastern Europe.
RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Scrapers is unique in a series of research studies covering the lubricants market in Russia.
The report focuses on the scraper segment, the large hydraulic systems of which give special status to the segment from the standpoint of lubricant consumption.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Scrapers is an in-depth analysis of the most efficient types of hydraulic fluids for scrapers used in mobile construction equipment developed according to international standards and characterized by high performance.
The research study examines hydraulic fluids market capacity with segmentation by viscosity and performance. An analysis of the state of the scraper market is provided, along with the overall situation in the road construction vehicle segment.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Scrapers contains:
The study is a source of valuable information for:
The report focuses on the scraper segment, the large hydraulic systems of which give special status to the segment from the standpoint of lubricant consumption.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Scrapers is an in-depth analysis of the most efficient types of hydraulic fluids for scrapers used in mobile construction equipment developed according to international standards and characterized by high performance.
The research study examines hydraulic fluids market capacity with segmentation by viscosity and performance. An analysis of the state of the scraper market is provided, along with the overall situation in the road construction vehicle segment.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Scrapers contains:
- Specifications for lubricants of all leading manufacturers of hydraulic systems and mobile equipment
- Requirements of international and national standards for the above-mentioned lubricants
- Comparison of requirements by key parameters
- Comparison of lubes by the most requested viscosity and operating classes
- Data on the existing fleet of scrapers and its place in the structure of advanced highway engineering
- Information on hydraulic lubricants which are used for road construction equipment and are approved by OEM producers
The study is a source of valuable information for:
- lubricantsproducers
- lubricantsdealersanddistributors
- mobileconstructionOEMs
1. Project Overview
1.1 Research Topic
1.2 Research Segmentation
1.3 Research Goal
1.4 Research Timeframe
1.5 Research Method
2. Road Construction Vehicle Fleet
2.1. Scraper Segment
2.1.1. Scraper Import Dynamics
2.1.2. Domestic Scraper Production Dynamics
2.1.3. Scraper Market Size Dynamics
2.1.4. Scraper Fleet Size
2.2. Overall Road Construction Vehicle Fleet Size
3. Mobile Construction Vehicle Manufacturer Analysis
3.1. Scraper Segment
3.1.1. Scraper Fleet by Manufacturer
3.4.2. Scraper Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic System Volume
3.1.3. Scraper Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic Fluid Type
4. Market Capacity
4.1. Total Market Capacity of Lubricants for Hydraulic Vehicles
4.2. Lubricant Segment Capacity Segmented by Lubricant Type
4.3. Lubricant Segment Capacity, Breakdown by Product Type and Construction Vehicle Manufacturer
4.4. The Market Capacity of High Performance Hydraulic Oils in Monetary Terms
4.5. Segment “Scrapers”
4.5.1. Oil Market Capacity for Scrapers
4.5.2. Oil Market Capacity for Scrapers with Respect to Oils Range Segmentation
5. Competitive Analysis
5.1. CJSC JSOPC Bashneft
5.1.1. Contact Information
5.1.2. Production GeoFigurey
5.1.3. Description of Oil Product Mix for Hydraulic Equipment
5.1.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.2. LLC Gazpromneft – lubricants
5.2.1. Contact Information
5.2.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.2.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.2.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.3. LLC LLK-International
5.3.1. Contact Details
5.3.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.3.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.3.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.4. OJSC NK Rosneft
5.4.1. Contact Information
5.4.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.4.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.4.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.5. OJSC NK Russneft
5.5.1. Contact Information
5.5.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.5.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.5.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.6. LLC TNK lubricants
5.6.1. Contact Information
5.6.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.6.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.6.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.7. OJSC AZMOL
5.7.1. Contact Information
5.7.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.7.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.7.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.8. Castrol
5.8.1. Contact Information
5.8.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.8.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.8.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.9. Chevron global lubricants
5.9.1. Contact Information
5.9.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.9.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.9.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.10. Exxonmobil
5.10.1. Contact Information
5.10.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.10.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.10.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.11. Shell
5.11.1. Contact Information
5.11.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.11.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.11.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.12. Total
5.12.1. Contacts
5.12.2. Manufacturing reach
5.12.3. Line-up of hydraulic fluids
5.12.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
6. Benchmarking Study of Market Segments
6.1. Most promising vehicles from HPHF market capacity perspectives
6.2. Most promising manufacturers from HPHF market capacity analysis
6.3. Market capacity by segments with key manufacturers and their products
6.4. Correspondence of products from lubricants manufacturers with most receptive market segments
7. Market Trends and Outlook
7.1. Factors influencing the absorption capacity of HPHF market
7.2. Prospects for the development / dynamics of changes in the HPHF market capacity
1.1 Research Topic
1.2 Research Segmentation
1.3 Research Goal
1.4 Research Timeframe
1.5 Research Method
2. Road Construction Vehicle Fleet
2.1. Scraper Segment
2.1.1. Scraper Import Dynamics
2.1.2. Domestic Scraper Production Dynamics
2.1.3. Scraper Market Size Dynamics
2.1.4. Scraper Fleet Size
2.2. Overall Road Construction Vehicle Fleet Size
3. Mobile Construction Vehicle Manufacturer Analysis
3.1. Scraper Segment
3.1.1. Scraper Fleet by Manufacturer
3.4.2. Scraper Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic System Volume
3.1.3. Scraper Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic Fluid Type
4. Market Capacity
4.1. Total Market Capacity of Lubricants for Hydraulic Vehicles
4.2. Lubricant Segment Capacity Segmented by Lubricant Type
4.3. Lubricant Segment Capacity, Breakdown by Product Type and Construction Vehicle Manufacturer
4.4. The Market Capacity of High Performance Hydraulic Oils in Monetary Terms
4.5. Segment “Scrapers”
4.5.1. Oil Market Capacity for Scrapers
4.5.2. Oil Market Capacity for Scrapers with Respect to Oils Range Segmentation
5. Competitive Analysis
5.1. CJSC JSOPC Bashneft
5.1.1. Contact Information
5.1.2. Production GeoFigurey
5.1.3. Description of Oil Product Mix for Hydraulic Equipment
5.1.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.2. LLC Gazpromneft – lubricants
5.2.1. Contact Information
5.2.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.2.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.2.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.3. LLC LLK-International
5.3.1. Contact Details
5.3.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.3.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.3.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.4. OJSC NK Rosneft
5.4.1. Contact Information
5.4.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.4.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.4.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.5. OJSC NK Russneft
5.5.1. Contact Information
5.5.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.5.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.5.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.6. LLC TNK lubricants
5.6.1. Contact Information
5.6.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.6.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.6.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.7. OJSC AZMOL
5.7.1. Contact Information
5.7.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.7.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.7.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.8. Castrol
5.8.1. Contact Information
5.8.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.8.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.8.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.9. Chevron global lubricants
5.9.1. Contact Information
5.9.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.9.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.9.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.10. Exxonmobil
5.10.1. Contact Information
5.10.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.10.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.10.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.11. Shell
5.11.1. Contact Information
5.11.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.11.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.11.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.12. Total
5.12.1. Contacts
5.12.2. Manufacturing reach
5.12.3. Line-up of hydraulic fluids
5.12.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
6. Benchmarking Study of Market Segments
6.1. Most promising vehicles from HPHF market capacity perspectives
6.2. Most promising manufacturers from HPHF market capacity analysis
6.3. Market capacity by segments with key manufacturers and their products
6.4. Correspondence of products from lubricants manufacturers with most receptive market segments
7. Market Trends and Outlook
7.1. Factors influencing the absorption capacity of HPHF market
7.2. Prospects for the development / dynamics of changes in the HPHF market capacity
График 2.1. Динамика импорта скреперов РФ, шт., 2001-2009 гг.
График 2.2. Динамика объема рынка скреперов, РФ, шт., 2001-2009 гг.
График 2.3. Объем парка скреперов, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 2.4. Объем парка дорожно-строительной техники, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 2.5. Объем парка дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе видов оборудования, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 3.1. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей оборудования, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 3.2. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе объема гидросистемы, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.3. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы до 110 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.4. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы от 110 до 170 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.5. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы от 170 до 270 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.6. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы более 270 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.7. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации масел, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.8. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ISO 46HM, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.9. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ISO 46HV, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.10. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте моторных масел для гидравлических систем, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.11. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте специфических масел ОЕМ-производителей для гидравлических систем, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.12. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ГОСТ, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.13. Объем парка скреперов для применения высокоэффективных гидравлических масел в разрезе производителей оборудования, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.14. Объем парка скреперов для применения высокоэффективных гидравлических масел в разрезе объема гидросистемы, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 4.1. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.2. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.3. Емкость рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.4. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 15 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.5. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 15 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.6. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 22 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.7. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 32 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.8. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 32 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.9. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.10. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.11. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 68 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.12. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 68 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.13. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 100 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.14. Емкость рынка* моторных масел для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.15. Емкость рынка моторных масел для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей и сегментов масел, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.16. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ОЕМ-производителей для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.17. Средняя стоимость высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, РФ, руб. за литр, 2010 г.
График 4.18. Емкость рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, РФ, руб., 2010 г.
График 4.19. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.20. Емкость рынка масел для скреперов в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации масел, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.21. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HM для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.22. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HV для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.23. Емкость рынка* моторных масел для гидравлических систем скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.24. Емкость рынка моторных масел для гидравлических систем скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и сегментов масел, РФ, литры, 2009 г.
График 4.25. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ОЕМ-производителей для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 7.1. Динамика емкости рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, литры, на конец года, 2009-2012 гг.
График 2.2. Динамика объема рынка скреперов, РФ, шт., 2001-2009 гг.
График 2.3. Объем парка скреперов, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 2.4. Объем парка дорожно-строительной техники, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 2.5. Объем парка дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе видов оборудования, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 3.1. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей оборудования, РФ, шт., 2009 г.
График 3.2. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе объема гидросистемы, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.3. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы до 110 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.4. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы от 110 до 170 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.5. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы от 170 до 270 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.6. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и объема гидросистемы более 270 литров, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.7. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации масел, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.8. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ISO 46HM, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.9. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ISO 46HV, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.10. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте моторных масел для гидравлических систем, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.11. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте специфических масел ОЕМ-производителей для гидравлических систем, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.12. Объем парка скреперов в разрезе производителей техники в сегменте масел ГОСТ, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.13. Объем парка скреперов для применения высокоэффективных гидравлических масел в разрезе производителей оборудования, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 3.14. Объем парка скреперов для применения высокоэффективных гидравлических масел в разрезе объема гидросистемы, РФ, % от шт., 2009 г.
График 4.1. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.2. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.3. Емкость рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.4. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 15 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.5. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 15 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.6. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 22 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.7. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 32 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.8. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 32 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.9. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.10. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.11. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 68 HM для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.12. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 68 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.13. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 100 HV для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.14. Емкость рынка* моторных масел для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.15. Емкость рынка моторных масел для гидравлических систем дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей и сегментов масел, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.16. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ОЕМ-производителей для дорожно-строительной техники в разрезе производителей, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.17. Средняя стоимость высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, РФ, руб. за литр, 2010 г.
График 4.18. Емкость рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, РФ, руб., 2010 г.
График 4.19. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.20. Емкость рынка масел для скреперов в разрезе ассортиментной сегментации масел, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.21. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HM для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.22. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ISO 46 HV для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.23. Емкость рынка* моторных масел для гидравлических систем скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 4.24. Емкость рынка моторных масел для гидравлических систем скреперов в разрезе производителей техники и сегментов масел, РФ, литры, 2009 г.
График 4.25. Емкость рынка* высокоэффективных масел ОЕМ-производителей для скреперов в разрезе производителей техники, РФ, % от литров, 2009 г.
График 7.1. Динамика емкости рынка высокоэффективных гидравлических масел, литры, на конец года, 2009-2012 гг.
Table 2.1. Scraper imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.2. Russian scraper market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.3. Russia's scraper fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.4. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.5. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Table 3.1. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.2. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 3.3. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 110 liters, pcs.
Table 3.4. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, hydraulic system volume 110 to 170 liters, pcs.
Table 3.5. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 170 to 270 liters, pcs.
Table 3.6. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 270 liters, pcs.
Table 3.7. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, pcs.
Table 3.8. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.9. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.10. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.11. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.12. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, pcs.
Table 3.13. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, pcs.
Table 3.14. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, liters
Table 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, liters
Table 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market * of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, liters
Table 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM lubricants for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Table 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Table 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.20. Oil market capacity for scrapers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.23. Market capacity* of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.24. Market capacity of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.25. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 6.1. Comparative Product Mixes of Different Companies, 2010
Table 6.2. Demand and Supply Matching on HPHF Market, 2010
Table 7.1. Targets of FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram
Table 7.2. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram, by Years
Table 7.3. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years, Updated in 2009
Table 7.4. Extension of Paved Motor Roads, km, 2000-2008
Table 7.5. The Volume of Construction Works in Actual Prices of 2007-2008, million rubles
Table 7.6. Commissioning of Residential and Non-residential Buildings, sq m, 2007-2008
Table 7.7. Investments in Oil Field Surface Facilities, billion rubles, 2010-2015
Table 2.2. Russian scraper market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.3. Russia's scraper fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.4. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.5. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Table 3.1. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.2. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 3.3. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 110 liters, pcs.
Table 3.4. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, hydraulic system volume 110 to 170 liters, pcs.
Table 3.5. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 170 to 270 liters, pcs.
Table 3.6. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 270 liters, pcs.
Table 3.7. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, pcs.
Table 3.8. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.9. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.10. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.11. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.12. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, pcs.
Table 3.13. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, pcs.
Table 3.14. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, liters
Table 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, liters
Table 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market * of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, liters
Table 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM lubricants for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Table 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Table 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.20. Oil market capacity for scrapers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.23. Market capacity* of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.24. Market capacity of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.25. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 6.1. Comparative Product Mixes of Different Companies, 2010
Table 6.2. Demand and Supply Matching on HPHF Market, 2010
Table 7.1. Targets of FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram
Table 7.2. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram, by Years
Table 7.3. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years, Updated in 2009
Table 7.4. Extension of Paved Motor Roads, km, 2000-2008
Table 7.5. The Volume of Construction Works in Actual Prices of 2007-2008, million rubles
Table 7.6. Commissioning of Residential and Non-residential Buildings, sq m, 2007-2008
Table 7.7. Investments in Oil Field Surface Facilities, billion rubles, 2010-2015
Figure 2.1. Scraper imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.2. Russian scraper market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.3. Russia's scraper fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.4. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.5 Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Figure 3.1. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent.
Figure 3.2. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.3. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 110 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.4. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 110 to 170 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.5. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 170 to 270 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.6. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 270 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.7. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.8. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.9. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.10. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.11. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.12. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.13. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in percent of pcs.
Figure 3.14. Russia’s HPHF-applicable scraper fleet, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs, 2009.
Figure 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, percent of liters
Figure 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of liters
Figure 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, percent of liters
Figure 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM fluids for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Figure 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Figure 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.20. Oil market capacity for scrapers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.22. Market capacity*of 46 HV high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.23. Market capacity* of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.24. Market capacity of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Figure 4.25. Market capacity*of OEM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 7.1 The dynamics of the HPHF market capacity, liters, by the year’s end, 2009-2012.
Figure 2.2. Russian scraper market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.3. Russia's scraper fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.4. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.5 Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Figure 3.1. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent.
Figure 3.2. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.3. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 110 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.4. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 110 to 170 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.5. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 170 to 270 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.6. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 270 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.7. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.8. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.9. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.10. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.11. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.12. Russia's scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.13. Russia's HPHF-applicable scraper fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in percent of pcs.
Figure 3.14. Russia’s HPHF-applicable scraper fleet, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs, 2009.
Figure 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, percent of liters
Figure 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of liters
Figure 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, percent of liters
Figure 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM fluids for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Figure 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Figure 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.20. Oil market capacity for scrapers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.22. Market capacity*of 46 HV high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.23. Market capacity* of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.24. Market capacity of engine oils for scraper hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Figure 4.25. Market capacity*of OEM high performance oils for scrapers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 7.1 The dynamics of the HPHF market capacity, liters, by the year’s end, 2009-2012.
Feedback
You can ask your question about report or leave your comment in a form below.
* By sending this form you agree with the Privacy policy and Processing of your personal data.
