Oil & Gas Production Refining and Marketing Services & Equipment Transportation & Export Design & EPC Lubricants & Greases Petrochemical Industry
Over the past 20 years, RPI has carried out hundreds of studies on all major segments of the oil and gas industry of Russia, CIS and Eastern Europe.

RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
Subscribe to RPI’s newsletter:

  

Additional services:
  • Preparing an expanded report tailored to the client’s goals and targets
  • Partner search on the market under study
  • Creating an individual presentation
  • Information and research support for the client with a focus on the topic of the report

Oil Well Stimulation and Enhanced Oil Recovery Markets in Russia and Forecasts for These Markets Until 2020
Oil Well Stimulation and Enhanced Oil Recovery Markets in Russia and Forecasts for These Markets Until 2020
Released: December 2012
Language: English, Russian
Quanity: 165 pages
Format: book and CD
Delivery: express shipping (2-4 days)
Price: € 1.800
The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed analysis of the markets for oil well stimulation and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in Russia, including a description of the main indicators of the E&P sector: output of crude oil, exploratory and development drilling, well servicing, stimulation jobs, oil recovery using secondary and tertiary oil recovery methods. Separate analysis will be provided for the following segments: horizontal drilling, side-tracking, hydrofacturing, bottomhole acidizing, chemical flooding, thermal EOR, injecting water and gas into the reservoir, as well as complex tertiary EOR methods. The report estimates the value of this market for each segment under review from 2012 through 2020.

RPI has tracked the development of Russia’s E&P sector for over 20 years, thus enabling the company’s analysts to offer deep insights into the prospects and risks inherent in the country’s production ventures. RPI’s analysts are also well versed in Russia’s hydrocarbon resource base, and this allows them to provide a cutting–edge assessment of EOR techniques.

The study provides detailed information on the main oil service companies that render EOR services in Russia. It also analyzes the needs and approaches to the procurement of EOR services by Russian VICs and independent companies.

The key sections of the report provide the following information:

  • Main indicator of the Russian oil industry. This section gives the key performance indicators (KPI) of the oil production industry, including output volumes, drilling, and the number of stimulation jobs involving EOR.
  • An evaluation of the EOR market in Russia. This section quantifies the main segments of the market in terms of monetary value. It analyzes the competitive environment, giving a breakdown of the market in terms of the main service providers. The main customers are reviewed, as well as their share in the overall use of services.
  • Analysis of main service users. This section analyzes the needs and approaches to the procurement of EOR services by Russian VICs and independent companies.
  • Analysis of main EOR service providers. This section offers overviews on key contractors on the EOR market in Russia. Each overview provides background information on the company and its owners, financial status, a list of available services and production facilities, as well as operating indicators.
  • Forecast of Russian oil well stimulation and EOR markets from 2012 through 2020. This section is devoted to a forecast for the markets, estimating the value of each segment based on the needs of Russia’s E&P sector in light of the production targets announced by domestic oil companies. In crafting this forecast, a number of factors come into play, including incremental production from low-porosity reservoirs, incremental production from high-viscosity and high-paraffin crude, as well as production from low-rate wells.
This product could be a valuable tool in the strategic decision-making process of oil service companies and companies that manufacture equipment used to perform oil well stimulation and EOR operations and are interested in rolling out their business in Russia. The report makes it possible to evaluate the most rapidly growing segments of the market, gain a better understanding of customers and current market trends, and also forecast the market’s expansion in the coming years.

The report’s forecasts and assumptions on probable development of oil well stimulation and EOR markets in Russia are based on a detailed analysis of information gained from reliable sources. This allows the reader to size up the market’s growth potential, opportunities, risks and threats both for the market as a whole and for its various players.
Introduction

Summary

1 Main Indicators of Russia’s Oil Industry

1.1 Oil Production
1.2. Scopes of Production and Prospecting Drilling

2 Fluid Inflow Stimulation Operations

2.1 Horizontal Drilling
2.2 Sidetracking
2.3 Fracturing
2.4 Hydrochloric bottom hole zone treatment

3 Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods

3.1 Secondary methods
3.2 Tertiary Methods

4 Appraisal of the Production Stimulation and EOR markets

5 Main Customers for EOR Services

5.1 VIOCs
5.1.1 Rosneft
5.1.2 LUKOIL
5.1.3 TNK-BP
5.1.4 Surgutneftegaz
5.1.5 Gazpromneft
5.1.6 Bashneft
5.1.7 Tatneft
5.1.8 Slavneft
5.1.9 RussNeft

6 Analysis of the major providers of stimulation oil production and enhanced oil recovery methods

6.1 Stimulation oil production with sidetracking and horisontal drilling
6.1.1 Burovaya Kompaniya Eurasia (BKE)
6.1.2 Integra-Burenie
6.1.3 Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya
6.1.4 Anega-Burenie
6.1.5 Belorusneft-Sibir
6.1.6 BKE Well Services Branch
6.1.7 CAT oil
6.1.8 SGK-Burenie
6.1.9 SSK
6.1.10 FOSKO
6.1.11 Weatherford
6.1.12 Surgutneftegaz well servicing and workover departments
6.1.13 Bashneft-Burenie
6.2 Stimulation oil production with bottomhole acidizing
6.2.1 Belorusskoye UPNP i KRS
6.2.2 KRS-Servis (RU-Energy Group)
6.2.3 RU-Energy KRS-MG (former Megion-Servis)
6.2.4 Permnefteotdacha (Nefteservisholding)
6.2.5 Samotlorneftepromkhim
6.2.6 Surgutneftegaz well servicing and workover departments
6.2.7 TatRemServis
6.2.8 Mamontovsky KRS
6.3 Stimulation oil production with fracturing
6.3.1 Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (CWS)
6.3.2 CAT îil AG (CATKoneft)
6.3.3 MeKaMineft
6.3.4 PetroAlliance Services Company Limited
6.3.5 Trican Well Services
6.3.6 Weatherford
6.3.7 Halliburton
6.3.8 Schlumberger
6.4 Enhanced oil recovery methods
6.4.1 TIORCO (NALCO)
6.4.2 GeotechnoKIN Research and Development Center
6.4.3 Surgutneftegaz well servicing and workover departments
6.4.4 Zarubezhneft
6.4.5 Halliburton
6.4.6 Schlumberger
6.4.7 Flagsol GmbH
6.4.8 Parker Hannifin Corporation

7 Projections for the dynamics of the production stimulation and EOR market in Russia, 2012-2020

7.1 Horizontal drilling
7.2 Sidetracking
7.3 Fracturing
7.4 Hydrochloric bottom hole zone treatment (HBHZT)
7.5 Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods
Chart 1. The ratio of base to incremental production due to stimulation methods and enhanced recovery methods
Chart 2. Dynamics of oil and gas production in the USA in 1970-2010
Chart 3. Distribution of active drilling rigs in the USA by type of well
Chart 1-1. Oil production in Russia by companies in 2002-2011, thousand tons per annum
Chart 1-2. Production and exploration drilling in Russia in 2001-2011, thousand meters
Chart 1-3. Main customers on the production drilling market in2011 (thousand meters and market share)
Chart 1-4. Regional production drilling in Russia in 2004-2011 (thousand meters)
Chart 1-5. Main customers on the exploration drilling market in 2011 (thousand meters and market share)
Chart 1-6. Regional exploration drilling in Russia in 2004-2011, thousand meters
Chart 2-1. Annual horizontal drilling of Russian VIOCs in 2002-2011, thousand meters
Chart 2-2. Dynamics of sidetracking operations and costs in Russia, 2004-2011
Chart 2-3. Incremental recovery from fracturing implied at old well stock, 2004-2011
Chart 2-4. Efficiency of fracturing used at old well stock, 2004-2011
Chart 2-5. Fracturing operations conducted on the old well stock and new wells, 2004-2011
Chart 2-6. Total effect from BHT in Russia, mln. tons, 2001-2011
Chart 2-7. Distribution of the hydrochloric treatment market over contractors, %, 2011
Chart 2-8. Growth of BHT efficiency in Russia, 2001-2011
Chart 3-1. Volume of water injected and injection efficiency at Russian oil fields, 2002-2011
Chart 5-1. Regional exploration drilling by Rosneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-2. Regional production drilling by Rosneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-3. Regional scope of horizontal drilling by Rosneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-4.Number of sidetracking operations and idle well share dynamics in the production well stock of Rosneft in 2005-2011
Chart 5-5. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock of Rosneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-6. Bottom-hole zone treatment operations by Rosneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-7. Dynamics of regional exploration drilling by LUKOIL in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-8. Regional production drilling by LUKOIL in 2004-2011
Chart 5-9. Regional horizontal drilling by LUKOIL in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-10. Sidetracking operations done by LUKOIL in 2004-2011
Chart 5-11. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock by LUKOIL in 2004-2011
Chart 5-12. Number of BHT operations by Rosneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-14. Regional production drilling by TNK-BP in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-16. Regional horizontal drilling by TNK-BP in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-17. Fracturing operations on the old well stock conducted by TNK-BP in 2004-2011
Chart 5-18. BHT operations by TNK-BP in 2001-2011
Chart 5-19. Regional exploration drilling by Surgutneftegaz in 2004-2011
Chart 5-20. Production drilling by Surgutneftegaz in 2004-2011 thousand meters
Chart 5-21. Structure of oil production, Surgutneftegaz, 2011, %
Chart 5-22. Scope of horizontal drilling by Surgutneftegaz in 2004-2011, thousand meters
Chart 5-23. Fracturing operations involving the old well stock by Surgutneftegaz in 2004-2011
Chart 5-24. Number of sidetracking operations by Surgutneftegaz in 2004-2011
Chart 5-25. Number of bottom hole zone treatment operations by Surgutneftegaz in 2001-2011
Chart 5-26. Scope of regional exploration drilling conducted by Gazpromneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-27. Production drilling by Gazpromneft over production regions in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-28. Sidetracking dynamics of Gazpromneft in 2005-2010
Chart 5-29. Regional horizontal drilling of Gazpromneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-30. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock of Gazpromneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-31. Number of BHT operations by Gazpromneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-32. Scope of regional exploration drilling of Bashneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters
Chart 5-33. Production drilling of Bashneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-34. Structure of oil recovery growth of Bashneft in 2011, thousand tons.
Chart 5-35. Scope of horizontal drilling of Bashneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-36. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock of Bashneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-37. Number of sidetracking operations by Bashneft in 2008-2011
Chart 5-38. Number of BHT operations by Bashneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-39. Scope of exploration drilling of Tatneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-40. Production drilling of Tatneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-41. Scope of horizontal drilling of Tatneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-42. Number of sidetracking operations by Tatneft in 2005-2011
Chart 5-43. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock of Tatneft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-44. Number of BHT operations of Tatneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-45. Scopes of regional exploration drilling by Slavneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum.
Chart 5-46. Regional production drilling of Slavneft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-47. Incremental oil production by Slavneft in 2011, %
Chart 5-48. Horizontal drilling of Slavneft in 2004-2011 â KMAA, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-49. Number of sidetracking operations by Slavneft in 2005-2011
Chart 5-50. Number of fracturing operations on the old well stock of Slavneft in 2005-2011
Chart 5-51. Number of BHT operations by Slavneft in 2001-2011
Chart 5-52. Regional exploration drilling by RussNeft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-53. Regional production drilling RussNeft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-54. Regional horizontal drilling of RussNeft in 2004-2011, thousand meters per annum
Chart 5-55. Fracturing operations on the old well stock of RussNeft in 2004-2011
Chart 5-56. Number of BHT operations by RussNeft in 2001-2011
Chart 6-1. BKE drilling inventory: Lifting capacity and maximum drilling depth (as of December 31, 2011)
Chart 6-2 Changes in meters drilled and well drilling by BKE
Chart 6-3 Integra-Burenie drilling rig fleet, by hoisting capacity and allocation
Chart 6-4. Number of well service jobs including production testing and BKE subsidiary performance
Chart 6-5. Wells drilled by SGK-Burenie, by customer, 2004-2011
Chart 7-1 Projections for horizontal drilling growth in Russia, thousand meters, 2012-2020
Chart 7-2. Contributions from individual oil and gas producing regions to horizontal drilling growth in Russia, 2011-2020
Chart 7-3. Projections for sidetracking in Russia, 2012-2020, thousand operations
Chart 7-4. Projections for the fracturing market in Russia, 2011-2020, number of operations
Chart 7-5. Growth of per well multi-stage fracturing operations in 2012-2020
Chart 7-6. Projections for HBHZT operations in 2012-2020, thousand
Chart 7-7. Forecast for thermal EOR market in Russia in the case of zeroing of MET for Bazhenov Group, 2011-2020., mln. USD
Table 1. Variation of incremental production in Russia, 2010-2011
Table 2. Comparative efficiency of enhanced recovery methods and production stimulation in Russia, 2011
Table 3. Overview of hard-to-recover reserves in Russia and the effective recovery solutions
Table 4. Regional distribution of hard-to-recover reserves in Russia
Table 5. Privileges for oil from low-permeability reservoirs
Table 2-1. Sidetracking operations in Russia in 2004-2011
Table 2-2. Sidetracking operations done by min contractors, 2010-2011
Table 2-3.Contractors capable of completing turnkey multi-stage fracturing in Russia, 2007-2010
Table 2-4. Production capacities and indicators of fracturing companies
Table 2-5.Pilot and commissioned projects, 2011-2012
Table 2-6. The main factors affecting the introduction of the service to the industry, 2011
Table 2-7. Main points of growth of multi-stage fracturing at Brownfield and Greenfield in the mid-term. Table 3-1. EOR methods
Table 3-2. Estimates of the efficiency of enhanced oil recovery and production stimulation in Russia, 2011
Table 3-3. Main EOR projects in Russia, 2012
Table 4-1.Appraisal of the EOR and production stimulation market in Russia over types of operation, 2011
Table 4-2. Number of well workover, cementing, testing and fracturing operations, 2011
Table 5-1. Scopes of stimulation and EOR operations done by VIOCs in 2011
Table 5-2. Tertiary EOR used by LUKOIL
Table 6-1. BKE production capacity as of December 31 of the corresponding year
Table 6-2. BKE production indices as of December 31 of the corresponding year
Table 6-3 BKE financial indices, all activities, 2007-2011, mln RUR
Table 6-4. BKE-Shelf financial indices, 2007-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-5. SWOT analysis for BKE
Table 6-6. Integra-Burenie production capacity and operation indices, 2007-2011
Table 6-7. Integra –Burenie financial indices, 2006-2010, thousand RUR
Table 6-8 Integra Group order portfolio, billion RUR
Table 6-9 Integra-Burenie SWOT-analysis
Table 6-10 SBK production capacity and production indices
Table 6-11. SBK financial indices, 2007-2011, thousand RUR
Table 6-12 SBK SWOT- analysis
Table 6-13. Production capacity and production indices of Anega-Burenie
Table 6-14. Anega-Burenie’s financial indices, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-15. Belorusneft-Sibir production capacity and production indices
Table 6-16. Belorusneft-Sibir financial indices, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-17. Production capacity and production indices of BKE well services department
Table 6-18. Production capacity and production indices of CATKoneft
Table 6-19. Financial indices of CATKoneft, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-20. Production capacity and production indices of CATOBNEFT
Table 6-21. Financial indices of CATOBNEFT, 2006-2011, thousands RUR
Table 6-22. Production capacity and production indices of CAToil-Drilling in the sidetracking segment
Table 6-23. Shares of various services in CAT oil AG’s revenue, %
Table 6-24 SGK-Burenie production capacity and production indices, 2008-2011
Table 6-25. SGK-Burenie financial indices, 2006-2010, thousand RUR
Table 6-26. Drilling crews, drilling rigs and meters drilled in 2010 by subsidiaries of SGK-Burenie
Table 6-27 SGK-Burenie SWOT analysis
Table 6-28. SSK’s drilling rig fleet breakdown by lifting capacity
Table 6-29. Production capacity and production indices of SSK
Table 6-30. SWOT- analysis of SSK
Table 6-31. FOSKO’s production capacity
Table 6-32. NPRS – 1 Production capacity and operating performance
Table 6-33. Production capacity of UKRS
Table 6-34. Production indices of UKRS
Table 6-35. UKRS financial indices, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-36. Production capacity of Chernogornefteservis
Table 6-37. Production indices of Chernogornefteservis
Table 6-38. Financial indices of Chernogornefteservis, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-39. Production capacity of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment
Table 6-40. Production indices of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment, 2007-2010
Table 6-41. Production capacity and production indices of Bashneft-Burenie in the sidetracking segment
Table 6-42. Production capacity of Belorusskoye UPNP i KRS
Table 6-43. Production indices of Belorusskoye UPNP i KRS
Table 6-44. Financial indices of Belorusskoye UPNP i KRS, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-45. Production capacity and production indices of KRS-Servis
Table 6-46. Financial indices of KRS-Servis, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-47. Production capacity and production indices of RU-Energy KRS-MG
Table 6-48. Financial indices of RU-Energy KRS-MG, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-49. Production capacity and production indices of Permnefteotdacha
Table 6-50. Financial indices of Permnefteotdacha, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-51-1. Production capacity and production indices of Samotlorneftepromkhim
Table 6-51-2. Financial indices of Samotlorneftepromkhim, 2007-2010, millions of rubles
Table 6-52. Production capacity of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment
Table 6-53. Production indices of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment, 2007-2010
Table 6-54. Production indices of TatneftRemServis
Table 6-55. Financial indices of TatneftRemServis, 2008-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-56. Production capacity of Mamontovsky KRS
Table 6-57. Production indices of Mamontovsky KRS
Table 6-58. Financial indices of Mamontovsky KRS, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-59. CWS’s production capacity and production indices in Russia
Table 6-60. CWS International’s financial indices, 2006-2010, thousands RUR
Table 6-61. SWOT analysis for CWS International
Table 6-62. Production capacity and production indices of CATKoneft in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-63. Production capacity and production indices of MeKaMineft in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-64. Production capacity and production indices of PetroAlliance Services Company LTD in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-65. Production capacity and production indices of Trican in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-66. Production capacity and production indices of Weatherford in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-67. Production capacity and production indices of Halliburton in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-68. Production capacity and production indices of Schlumberger in the hydraulic fracturing segment
Table 6-69. Production capacity of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment
Table 6-70. Production indices of Surgutneftegaz in the well servicing and workover segment, 2007-2010
Table 7-1. The main "points of growth" of tertiary EOR in Russia in 2012-2020

Feedback

You can ask your question about report or leave your comment in a form below.

* By sending this form you agree with the Privacy policy and Processing of your personal data.



SUBJECT
FULL NAME*
E-MAIL*
PHONE*
COMPANY NAME*
MESSAGE*