Over the past 20 years, RPI has carried out hundreds of studies on all major segments of the oil and gas industry of Russia, CIS and Eastern Europe.
RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
Oilfield Services Companies in Russia 2009 contains over 100 detailed profiles of oilfield services companies grouped by key segments of the Russian OFS market:
- production drilling
- well servicing and well workovers
- seismic survey and geophysics
- intensification of oil production
- brief description
- corporate structure (including subsidiaries)
- regions of operation
- list of services offered
- major customers
- operation facilities and indicators (H1 2009)
- financial indicators (2008 year-end)
- service departments of vertically-integrated companies
- oilfield service holdings (with profiles of subsidiaries)
- independent Russian oilfield services companies
- international oilfield services companies (including their earlier acquired Russian subsidiaries)
- oil and gas companies
- services companies
- equipment manufacturers and suppliers
- banks and investment companies
- financial institutions
Chapter 1. Oilfield services market in Russia: general overview
2.1. Drilling in 2007-2008 by region:
2.1.2. drilling footage volumes by contractor
2.1.3. share of companies in total drilling footage
2.1.4. number of drilling crews by contractor and estimated drilling footage per crew
2.1.5. key development trends of the segment
2.1.6. profiles of drilling companies
Drilling
2.2.1.seismic survey: number of parties by company and volume of 2D/3D operations
2.2.2.oilfield geophysics: number of parties and operations by company
2.2.3.profiles of segment players
2.3.1. number of operations by company
2.3.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.3.3. profiles of segment players
2.4.1. Hydraulic fracturing
2.4.1.1. number of operations by company
2.4.1.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.4.1.3. profiles of segment players
2.4.2.1. number of operations by company
2.4.2.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.4.2.3. profiles of segment players
- drilling
- hydraulic fracturing
- formation evaluation
- production logging
2.1. Drilling in 2007-2008 by region:
2.1.2. drilling footage volumes by contractor
2.1.3. share of companies in total drilling footage
2.1.4. number of drilling crews by contractor and estimated drilling footage per crew
2.1.5. key development trends of the segment
2.1.6. profiles of drilling companies
Drilling
- Agan-Burenie (GEOTEK Holding)
- ANEGA Burenie (ANEGA Holding)
- Baikit Oil and Gas Exploration Expedition (Slavneft)
- Baker Hughes
- Bashneft-Geostroy (Bashneft)
- Eurasia Drilling Company
- Gazprom-Burenie
- Geodata (SibNATS Group of Companies)
- Integra Group of Companies
- Intaneft (GEOTEK Holding)
- KCA Deutag
- L-burenie
- Megionskoye UBR (Slavneft)
- Nabors Industries
- Rimera, Oilfield Services Division of ChTPZ Group
- Nizhnevartovskburneft (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Nizhnevartovsk Well Servicing Enterprise No. 1 (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Obneftegazgeologiya (Slavneft)
- Oil Technology Overseas (OTO)
- Orenburgburneft (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Orenburgskaya Burovaya Kompaniya
- Parker SMNG Drilling (Parker Drilling)
- RN-Burenie (Rosneft)
- RUP PO Belorusneft
- SGK-Burenie (Schlumberger)
- Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya (Gazprom neft)
- Sibirskaya Servisnaya Kompaniya (SSK)
- Slavneft-Megionneftegazgeologiya
- Surgutneftegaz
- Tomskburneftegaz
- UK Tatburneft (Tatneft)
- Urengoyneftegazgeologiya (SibNATS Group of Companies)
- Usinskgeonef
- C.A.T.OBNEFT (C.A.T. oil AG)
- C.A.T.oil Drilling (C.A.T. oil AG)
- Eurasia Drilling Company
- MeCaMineft
- Nizhnevartovsk Well Servicing Enterprise No. 1 (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Rimera, Oilfield Services Division of ChTPZ Group
- Urengoyneftegazgeologiya (SibNATS Group of Companies)
- Tatneft-RemService
2.2.1.seismic survey: number of parties by company and volume of 2D/3D operations
2.2.2.oilfield geophysics: number of parties and operations by company
2.2.3.profiles of segment players
- Bashneftegeofizika (ANEGA Holding)
- Boguchanskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspediciya (GEOTEK Holding)
- C.A.T.oil GEODATA (C.A.T. oil AG)
- Gazprom-Geofizika
- Gazpromneft-Noyabrskneftegazgeofizika
- Integra Group of Companies: Business-Block “Geofizika”
- Irkutskgeofizika
- Kaliningradgeofizika
- Komineftegeofizika
- Krasnodarneftegeofizika
- Khantymansiyskgeofizika (GEOTEK Holding)
- Naryan-Marseysmorazvedka (GEOTEK Holding)
- Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
- Novosibneftegazgeofizika (GEOTEK Holding)
- Orenburgneftegeofizika (BakerHughes)
- Orenburgskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspediciya (GEOTEK Holding)
- Permneftegeofizika
- PetroAlians (Schlumberger Ltd.)
- PITS «Geofizika» (Nefteservisholding)
- Polyareks (SibNATS Group of Companies)
- Purnefteotdacha (RN-Servis)
- RUP PO Belorusneft
- Samaraneftegeofizika
- Saratovneftegeofizika
- Severgeofizika (GEOTEK Holding)
- Sibneftegeofizika (GEOTEK Holding)
- Surgutneftegeofizika (Surgutneftegaz)
- Tsentralnaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspediciya (GEOTEK Holding)
- TNG-Group (Tatneft)
- Tomskneftegazgeofizika (Rimera, Oilfield Services Division of ChTPZ Group)
- Tyumenpromgeofizika (Schlumberger Ltd.)
- Volgogradneftegeofizika
- Universal-Service (Nefteservisholding)
- Yeniseygeofizika (GEOTEK Holding)
- Yuganskneftegazgeofizika (Rimera, Oilfield Services Division of ChTPZ Group)
- Yakutskgeofizika
2.3.1. number of operations by company
2.3.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.3.3. profiles of segment players
- C.A.T.Koneft (C.A.T. oil AG)
- C.A.T.OBNEFT (C.A.T. oil AG)
- Chernogornefteservis (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Eurasia Drilling Company
- FOSCO
- Integra Group of Companies
- Kapitalny Remont Skvazhin (RN-Servis)
- KRS-Servis (Gazprom neft – Nefteservis)
- Mamontovsky KRS (RN-Servis)
- Megion-Servis (Slavneft)
- MeCaMineft
- Nefteservisholding
- Oil Technology Overseas (OTO)
- Parker SMNG Drilling (Parker Drilling)
- Rimera, Oilfield Services Division of ChTPZ Group
- RUP PO Belorusneft
- Tatneft-RemServis
- TechInformServis (Weatherford International Ltd.)
- Surgutneftegaz
- Upravlenie po kapitalnomu remontu skvazhin (UKRS) (Weatherford International Ltd.)
2.4.1. Hydraulic fracturing
2.4.1.1. number of operations by company
2.4.1.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.4.1.3. profiles of segment players
- C.A.T.Koneft (C.A.T. oil AG)
- C.A.T.OBNEFT (C.A.T. oil AG)
- CWS International
- Halliburton International Inc
- MeCaMineft
- Newco Well Services (Trican)
- Surgutneftegaz
- Tatneft
- Weatherford International Ltd.
2.4.2.1. number of operations by company
2.4.2.2. share of companies in overall volume of operations
2.4.2.3. profiles of segment players
- BJ Services
- Halliburton International Inc
- Oil Technology Overseas
- Purnefteotdacha (RN-Servis)
- Surgutneftegaz
- Tatneft-RemServis (Tatneft)
Figure 1-1 Production and exploration drilling in Russia in 2001-2008, thousands of meters
Figure 1- 2 Market shares of drilling contractors in Russia by drilling footage, 2008 (%)
Figure 1-3 Market shares of drilling contractors in Russia by drilling footage, 2007
Figure 1-4 Number of drilling crews operated by drilling contractors in 2008
Figure 1-5 Meters drilled per drilling crew in 2008, thousands of meters per year
Figure 1-6 Workover jobs by oil producing companies, 2001-2008
Figure 1-7 Market shares of individual workover contractors in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-8 Market shares of individual contractors in the fracturing segment in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-9 Number of fracturing jobs performed by individual companies in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-10 2D seismic activity in Russia in 2002-2008: volumes and YoY growth/decline
Figure 1-11 2D seismic volumes (linear kilometers) by contractor, 2008
Figure 1-12 Market shares of key players in the 2D seismic market in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-13 3D seismic activity in Russia in 2002-2008
Figure 1-14 3D seismic work by largest contractors in Russia, 2008 (square km)
Figure 1-15 Market shares of key players in the 3D seismic market in Russia, 2008
Figure 1- 2 Market shares of drilling contractors in Russia by drilling footage, 2008 (%)
Figure 1-3 Market shares of drilling contractors in Russia by drilling footage, 2007
Figure 1-4 Number of drilling crews operated by drilling contractors in 2008
Figure 1-5 Meters drilled per drilling crew in 2008, thousands of meters per year
Figure 1-6 Workover jobs by oil producing companies, 2001-2008
Figure 1-7 Market shares of individual workover contractors in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-8 Market shares of individual contractors in the fracturing segment in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-9 Number of fracturing jobs performed by individual companies in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-10 2D seismic activity in Russia in 2002-2008: volumes and YoY growth/decline
Figure 1-11 2D seismic volumes (linear kilometers) by contractor, 2008
Figure 1-12 Market shares of key players in the 2D seismic market in Russia, 2008
Figure 1-13 3D seismic activity in Russia in 2002-2008
Figure 1-14 3D seismic work by largest contractors in Russia, 2008 (square km)
Figure 1-15 Market shares of key players in the 3D seismic market in Russia, 2008
Table 1-1 Regions of drilling contractors’ operations
Table 1-2 Seismic survey crews deployed by geophysical companies, 2008
Table 1-3 Production logging crews deployed by geophysical companies in Russia, 2008
Table 2-1 Operational capacity and performance of BASHNEFT-Geostroy
Table 2-2 Financial performance of BurKan, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-3 Financial performance of Neftekamskoye UBR, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-4 Financial performance of Ufimsloye UBR, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-5 Operational capacity and performance of RUP PO Belorusneft
Table 2-6 Operational capacity of Gazprom Burenie (former Burgas)
Table 2-7 Gazprom Burenie: operational capacity by branches
Table 2-8 Operational performance by Gazprom Burenie
Table 2-9 Financial performance of Gazprom Burenie, 2005-2008
Table 2-10 Operational capacity and performance of Kostromageofizika
Table 2-11 Financial performance of Kostromageofizika
Table 2-12 Operational capacity and performance of Gazpromneft-Nefteservis
Table 2-13 Operational capacity and performance of Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-14 Financial performance of Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya,2005-2008
Table 2-15 Operational capacity and performance of OAO Gazpromneft-NNGGF
Table 2-16 Financial performance of OAO Gazpromneft-NNGGF, 2006-1H 2009
Table 2-17 Operational performance of KRS-Servis
Table 2-18 Financial performance of KRS-Servis, 2006-2008
Table 2-19 Operational performance of YamalServisTsentr
Table 2-20 Financial performance of OOO YamalServisTsentr, 2005-2008
Table 2-21 Operational capacity and performance of NTsTB
Table 2-22 Financial performance of NTsTB, 2006-2008
Table 2-23 Financial performance of Noyabrskneftespetsstroy
Table 2-24 Financial performance of Muravlenkovskaya Transportnaya Kompaniya, 2005-2008
Table 2-25 Financial performance of STK, 2005-2008
Table 2-26 Financial performance of SpetsTransServis, 2005-2008
Table 2-27 Operational capacity and performance of RN-Burenie
Table 2-28 RN-Servis branches
Table 2-29 Financial performance of RN-Servis, 2007-2008
Table 2-30 Mamontovsky KRS operating capacity and performance
Table 2-31 Operational capacity and performance of Megionskoye UBR
Table 2-32 Financial performance of Megionskoye UBR, 2005-2008
Table 2-33 Operational capacity and performance of Megion-Servis
Table 2-34 Financial performance of Megion-Servis, 2005-2008
Table 2-35 Operational capacity and performance of Slavneft-Megionneftegazgeologiya
Table 2-36 Financial performance of Slavneft-Megionneftegazgeologiya, 2007-2008
Table 2-36 Operational capacity and performance of Obneftegasgeologiya
Table 2-38 Financial performance of Obneftegasgeologiya, 2006-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-39 Operational performance of Baikitskaya Neftegazorazvedochnaya Ekspeditsiya (BNGRE)
Table 2-40 Financial performance of BNGRE, 2005-2008
Table 2-41 Operational performance of MeKaMineft
Table 2-42 Financial performance of MeKaMineft, 2005-2008
Table 2-43 Operational capacity and performance of Surgutneftegas
Table 2-44 Operational capacity and performance of Burenie
Table 2-45 Financial performance of Burenie, 2008
Table 2-46 Operational capacity and performance of Tatneft-RemServis
Table 2-47 Financial performance of Tatneft-RemService, 2008
Table 2-48 TNG Group geography of business
Table 2-49 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Group
Table 2-50 Financial performance of TNG Group, 2005-2008
Table 2-51 Major clients of TNG-AlGIS in 2008 and 2009
Table 2-52 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-AlGIS
Table 2-53 Financial performance of TNG-AlGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-54 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Geoseis
Table 2-55 Financial performance of TNG-Geoseis, 2006-2008
Table 2-56 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Izhgeofizservice
Table 2-57 Financial performance of TNG-Izhgeofizservice, 2006-2008
Table 2-58 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Kazangeofizika
Table 2-59 Financial performance of TNG-Kazangeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-60 Operational capacity of TNG-Komigeo
Table 2-61 Financial performance of TNG-Komigeo, 2006-2008
Table 2-62 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-KomiGIS
Table 2-63 Financial performance of TNG-KomiGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-64 Operational performance of TNG-Lenburneft
Table 2-65 Financial performance of TNG-Lenburneft, 2007-2008
Table 2-66 Operational capacity of TNG-LenGIS
Table 2-67 Financial performance of TNG-LenGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-68 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-NurGIS
Table 2-69 Financial performance of TNG-NurGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-70 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Oralgeo
Table 2-71 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Vostokgeo
Table 2-72 Financial performance of TNG-Vostokgeo, 2005-2006
Table 2-73 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Yugraservis
Table 2-74 Financial performance of TNG-Yugraservis, 2006-2008
Table 2-75 Operational capacity and performance of Uzenpromgeofizika
Table 2-76 Financial performance of TNG-Universal, 2006-2008
Table 2-77 Geography of business operations and major clients of Bashneftegeofizika in 2008
Table 2-78 Operational capacity and performance of Bashneftegeofizika
Table 2-79 Financial performance of Bashneftegeofizika, 2006-2008
Table 2-80 Operational capacity and performance of Taimyrgeofizika
Òable 2-81 Financial performance of Taimyrgeofizika
Table 2-82 Operational capacity of Kogalymneftegeofizika
Òable 2-83 Financial performance of Kogalymneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-84 Operational capacity of ANEGA-Burenie
Table 2-85 Financial performance of ANEGA-Burenie, 2006 – 2008
Table 2-86 Financial performance of NPF Geofizika
Table 2-87 Operational capacity and performance of C.A.T. oil AG in Russia
Table 2-88 Operational capacity and performance of Ñ.A.T.OBNEFT
Table 2-89 Financial performance of Ñ.A.T.OBNEFT, 2005-2008
Òable 2-90 Operational capacity and performance of FilOrAm
Table 2-91 Financial performance of FilOrAm
Table 2-92 Operational capacity and performance of C.A.T.Koneft
Table 2-93 Financial performance of C.A.T.Koneft, 2005-2008
Table 2-94 Operational performance of C.A.T.oil Drilling
Table 2-95 Operatioò ñapacity of C.A.T.oil GEODATA, 2008
Table 2-96 Financial performance of C.A.T.oil GEODATA, 2007-2008
Table 2-97 Operational capacity andPerformance of GEOTECH Holding
Table 2-98 Operational capacity and performance of Naryan-Marseismorazvedka
Table 2-99 Financial performance of Naryan-Marseismorazvedka, 2007-2008
Table 2-100 Operational capacity and performance of Severgeofizika
Table 2-101 Financial performance of Severgeofizika,2005-IQ2009
Table 2-102 Operational capacity and performance of Novosibneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-103 Financial performance of Nobosibirskgeofizika, 2007-2008
Table 2-104 Operational capacity and performance of Sibneftegeofizika
Table 2-105 Financial performance of Sibneftegeofizika, 2005-1H 2009
Table 2-106 Operational capacity and performance of Khantymansiyskgeofizika
Table 2-107 Financial performance of Khantymansiyskgeofizika, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-108 Operational capacity and performance of Tsentralnaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-109 Financial performance of Tsentralnaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-110 Operational performance of Boguchanskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-111 Financial performance of Boguchanskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2005-2008
Table 2-112 Operational capacity and performance of Yeniseygeofizika
Table 2-113 Financial performance of Yeniseygeofizika, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-114 Financial performance of Ilimpeiskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-115 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-116 Financial performance of Orenburgskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2006-2008
Table 2-117 Operational capacity and performance of Intaneft
Table 2-118 Financial performance of Intaneft, 2005-2008
Table 2-119 Operational capacity and performance of Agan-Burenie
Table 2-120 Financial performance of Agan-Burenie, 2005-2008
Table 2-121 Operational capacity and performance of Integra’s Drilling, Workover & IPM business-division
Table 2-122 Operational capacity and performance of Integra’ Geophisics business division
Table 2-123 Consolidated financial performance of Integra Group, $ million
Table 2-124 Operational capacity and performance of Neftservisholding
Table 2-125 Operational capacity and performance of PITS Geophizika
Table 2-126 Financial performance of PITS Geofizika, 2005-2007
Table 2-127 Operational capacity and performance of Permenefteotdacha
Table 2-128 Financial performance of Permnefteotdacha, 2005-2008
Table 2-129 Operational capacity and performance of Universal-Service
Table 2-130 Financial performance of Universal Service, 2005-2007
Table 2-131 Operational performance of Ontustik Munaygas
Table 2-132 Operational capacity and performance of South-Eastern Service Group LLP
Table 2-133 Financial performance of FLEK, 2005-2008
Table 2-134 Financial performance of Tsentr Tekhnicheskogo Servisa, 2005-2008
Table 2-135 Financial performance of Servis ÒÒ, 2005-2007
Table 2-136 Financial performance of SPO-Alnas
Table 2-137 Financial performance of UTT Polaznaneft
Table 2-138 Financial performance of PermAvtoTransServis
Table 2-139 Financial performance of Teploservis, 2005-2007
Table 2-140 Operational capacity and performance of Rimera
Table 2-141 Operational capacity of Yuganskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-142 Financial performance of Yuganskneftegazgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-143 Operational capacity and performance of Tomskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-144 Financial performance of Tomskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-145 Operational performance of Taimyrnefterazvedka
Table 2-146 Financial performance of Taimyrnefterazvedka
Table 2-147 Financial performance of Alnas
Table 2-148 Operational capacity and performance of PolarEx
Table 2-149 Financial performance of PolarEx
Table 2-150 Geography of business operations and major customers of MNP Geodata in 2008-2009
Table 2-151 Operational capacity and performance of MNP Geodata
Table 2-152 Financial performance MNP Geodata
Table 2-153 Operational performance of Urengoineftegasgeologia
Table 2-154 Financial performance of Urengoineftegasgeologia
Table 2-155 Financial performance of Siberian Complex Expedition
Table 2-156 Operational capacity and performance of BKE
Table 2-157 Financial performance of BKE
Table 2-158 Fnancial performance of BKE-Shelf
Table 2-159 Operational capacity of FOSCO
Table 2-160 Operational capacity and performance of L-Burenie
Table 2-161 Financial performance of L-Burenie
Table 2-162 Operational capacity of L-Servis
Table 2-163 Financial performance of L-Servis
Table 2-164 Operational capacity of OTO
Table 2-165 Operational capacity and performance of OTO Recovery
Table 2-166 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgskaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-167 Financial performance of Orenburgskaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-168 Financial performance of Neftepromburservis, 2005-2008
Table 2-169 Operational capacity and performance of SSK
Table 2-170 Financial performance of SSK
Table 2-171 Geography of business operations and major clients of Tomskburneftegas in 2007 and 2008
Table 2-172 Operational capacity and performance of Tomskburneftegas
Table 2-173 Financial performance of Tomskburneftegas
Table 2-174 Operational capacity and performance of Irkutskgeofizika
Table 2-175 Financial performance of Irkutskgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-176 Operational capacity and performance of Kaliningradgeofizika
Table 2-177 Financial performance of Kaliningradgeofizika
Table 2-178 Operational capacity and performance of Komineftegeofizika
Table 2-179 Financial performance of Komineftegeofizika, 2006-2008
Table 2-180 Operational performance of Krasnodarneftegeofizika
Table 2-181 Financial performance of Krasnodarneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-182 Geography of business operations and major clients of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-183 Operational performance of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-184 Financial performance of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-185 Operational capacity and performance of Permneftegeofizika
Table 2-186 Financial performance of Permneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-187 Operational capacity and performance of Samaraneftegeofizika
Table 2-188 Financial performance of Samaraneftegeofizika
Table 2-189 Operational capacity and performance of Saratovneftegeofizika
Table 2-190 Financial performance of Saratovneftegeofizika, 2005-2009
Table 2-191 Clients of Stavropolneftegeofizika in 2008
Table 2-192 Operational capacity and performance of Stavropolneftegeofizika
Table 2-193 Financial performance of Stavropolneftegeofizika, 2005-2009
Table 2-194 Operational capacity and performance of Volgogradneftegeofizika
Table 2-195 Financial performance of Volgogradneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-196 Operational capacity and performance of Yakutskgeofizika
Table 2-197 Financial performance of Yakutskgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-198 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgneftegeofizika
Table 2-199 Financial performance of Orenburgneftegeofizika
Table 2-200 Operational capacity and performance of Calfrac Well Services in Russia
Table 2-201 Financial performance of CWS in Russia
Table 2-202 Operation capacity of KCA DEUTAG Russia
Table 2-203 Financial performance of KCA DEUTAG Russia, 2005-2008
Table 2-204 Operation performance of KCA DEUTAG Drilling
Table 2-205 Financial performance of KCA DEUTAG Drilling, 2005-2008
Table 2-206 Financial performance of Parker Drilling, 2006-2008
Table 2-207 Financial performance of Parker SMNG Drilling, 2005-2007
Table 2-208 Operational capacity and performance of SGK-Burenie
Table 2-209 Financial performance of SGK-Burenie, 2007 – 2008
Table 2-210 Geography of business and major clients of PetroAliance in 2008
Table 2-211 Operational capacity of PetroAlliance
Table 2-212 Financial performance of PetroAlliance
Table 2-213 Geography of business and major clients of Tyumenpromgeofizika in 2008
Table 2-214 Operational capacity and performance of PGO Tyumenpromgeofizika
Table 2-215 Financial performance of PGO Tyumenpromgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-216 Operational capacity and performance of Newco Well Service
Table 2-217 Financial performance of Newco Well Service in Russia
Table 1-2 Seismic survey crews deployed by geophysical companies, 2008
Table 1-3 Production logging crews deployed by geophysical companies in Russia, 2008
Table 2-1 Operational capacity and performance of BASHNEFT-Geostroy
Table 2-2 Financial performance of BurKan, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-3 Financial performance of Neftekamskoye UBR, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-4 Financial performance of Ufimsloye UBR, 2005 – 2008
Table 2-5 Operational capacity and performance of RUP PO Belorusneft
Table 2-6 Operational capacity of Gazprom Burenie (former Burgas)
Table 2-7 Gazprom Burenie: operational capacity by branches
Table 2-8 Operational performance by Gazprom Burenie
Table 2-9 Financial performance of Gazprom Burenie, 2005-2008
Table 2-10 Operational capacity and performance of Kostromageofizika
Table 2-11 Financial performance of Kostromageofizika
Table 2-12 Operational capacity and performance of Gazpromneft-Nefteservis
Table 2-13 Operational capacity and performance of Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-14 Financial performance of Servisnaya Burovaya Kompaniya,2005-2008
Table 2-15 Operational capacity and performance of OAO Gazpromneft-NNGGF
Table 2-16 Financial performance of OAO Gazpromneft-NNGGF, 2006-1H 2009
Table 2-17 Operational performance of KRS-Servis
Table 2-18 Financial performance of KRS-Servis, 2006-2008
Table 2-19 Operational performance of YamalServisTsentr
Table 2-20 Financial performance of OOO YamalServisTsentr, 2005-2008
Table 2-21 Operational capacity and performance of NTsTB
Table 2-22 Financial performance of NTsTB, 2006-2008
Table 2-23 Financial performance of Noyabrskneftespetsstroy
Table 2-24 Financial performance of Muravlenkovskaya Transportnaya Kompaniya, 2005-2008
Table 2-25 Financial performance of STK, 2005-2008
Table 2-26 Financial performance of SpetsTransServis, 2005-2008
Table 2-27 Operational capacity and performance of RN-Burenie
Table 2-28 RN-Servis branches
Table 2-29 Financial performance of RN-Servis, 2007-2008
Table 2-30 Mamontovsky KRS operating capacity and performance
Table 2-31 Operational capacity and performance of Megionskoye UBR
Table 2-32 Financial performance of Megionskoye UBR, 2005-2008
Table 2-33 Operational capacity and performance of Megion-Servis
Table 2-34 Financial performance of Megion-Servis, 2005-2008
Table 2-35 Operational capacity and performance of Slavneft-Megionneftegazgeologiya
Table 2-36 Financial performance of Slavneft-Megionneftegazgeologiya, 2007-2008
Table 2-36 Operational capacity and performance of Obneftegasgeologiya
Table 2-38 Financial performance of Obneftegasgeologiya, 2006-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-39 Operational performance of Baikitskaya Neftegazorazvedochnaya Ekspeditsiya (BNGRE)
Table 2-40 Financial performance of BNGRE, 2005-2008
Table 2-41 Operational performance of MeKaMineft
Table 2-42 Financial performance of MeKaMineft, 2005-2008
Table 2-43 Operational capacity and performance of Surgutneftegas
Table 2-44 Operational capacity and performance of Burenie
Table 2-45 Financial performance of Burenie, 2008
Table 2-46 Operational capacity and performance of Tatneft-RemServis
Table 2-47 Financial performance of Tatneft-RemService, 2008
Table 2-48 TNG Group geography of business
Table 2-49 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Group
Table 2-50 Financial performance of TNG Group, 2005-2008
Table 2-51 Major clients of TNG-AlGIS in 2008 and 2009
Table 2-52 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-AlGIS
Table 2-53 Financial performance of TNG-AlGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-54 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Geoseis
Table 2-55 Financial performance of TNG-Geoseis, 2006-2008
Table 2-56 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Izhgeofizservice
Table 2-57 Financial performance of TNG-Izhgeofizservice, 2006-2008
Table 2-58 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Kazangeofizika
Table 2-59 Financial performance of TNG-Kazangeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-60 Operational capacity of TNG-Komigeo
Table 2-61 Financial performance of TNG-Komigeo, 2006-2008
Table 2-62 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-KomiGIS
Table 2-63 Financial performance of TNG-KomiGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-64 Operational performance of TNG-Lenburneft
Table 2-65 Financial performance of TNG-Lenburneft, 2007-2008
Table 2-66 Operational capacity of TNG-LenGIS
Table 2-67 Financial performance of TNG-LenGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-68 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-NurGIS
Table 2-69 Financial performance of TNG-NurGIS, 2006-2008
Table 2-70 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Oralgeo
Table 2-71 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Vostokgeo
Table 2-72 Financial performance of TNG-Vostokgeo, 2005-2006
Table 2-73 Operational capacity and performance of TNG-Yugraservis
Table 2-74 Financial performance of TNG-Yugraservis, 2006-2008
Table 2-75 Operational capacity and performance of Uzenpromgeofizika
Table 2-76 Financial performance of TNG-Universal, 2006-2008
Table 2-77 Geography of business operations and major clients of Bashneftegeofizika in 2008
Table 2-78 Operational capacity and performance of Bashneftegeofizika
Table 2-79 Financial performance of Bashneftegeofizika, 2006-2008
Table 2-80 Operational capacity and performance of Taimyrgeofizika
Òable 2-81 Financial performance of Taimyrgeofizika
Table 2-82 Operational capacity of Kogalymneftegeofizika
Òable 2-83 Financial performance of Kogalymneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-84 Operational capacity of ANEGA-Burenie
Table 2-85 Financial performance of ANEGA-Burenie, 2006 – 2008
Table 2-86 Financial performance of NPF Geofizika
Table 2-87 Operational capacity and performance of C.A.T. oil AG in Russia
Table 2-88 Operational capacity and performance of Ñ.A.T.OBNEFT
Table 2-89 Financial performance of Ñ.A.T.OBNEFT, 2005-2008
Òable 2-90 Operational capacity and performance of FilOrAm
Table 2-91 Financial performance of FilOrAm
Table 2-92 Operational capacity and performance of C.A.T.Koneft
Table 2-93 Financial performance of C.A.T.Koneft, 2005-2008
Table 2-94 Operational performance of C.A.T.oil Drilling
Table 2-95 Operatioò ñapacity of C.A.T.oil GEODATA, 2008
Table 2-96 Financial performance of C.A.T.oil GEODATA, 2007-2008
Table 2-97 Operational capacity andPerformance of GEOTECH Holding
Table 2-98 Operational capacity and performance of Naryan-Marseismorazvedka
Table 2-99 Financial performance of Naryan-Marseismorazvedka, 2007-2008
Table 2-100 Operational capacity and performance of Severgeofizika
Table 2-101 Financial performance of Severgeofizika,2005-IQ2009
Table 2-102 Operational capacity and performance of Novosibneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-103 Financial performance of Nobosibirskgeofizika, 2007-2008
Table 2-104 Operational capacity and performance of Sibneftegeofizika
Table 2-105 Financial performance of Sibneftegeofizika, 2005-1H 2009
Table 2-106 Operational capacity and performance of Khantymansiyskgeofizika
Table 2-107 Financial performance of Khantymansiyskgeofizika, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-108 Operational capacity and performance of Tsentralnaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-109 Financial performance of Tsentralnaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-110 Operational performance of Boguchanskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-111 Financial performance of Boguchanskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2005-2008
Table 2-112 Operational capacity and performance of Yeniseygeofizika
Table 2-113 Financial performance of Yeniseygeofizika, 2005-I-IIIQ2009
Table 2-114 Financial performance of Ilimpeiskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-115 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya
Table 2-116 Financial performance of Orenburgskaya Geofizicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, 2006-2008
Table 2-117 Operational capacity and performance of Intaneft
Table 2-118 Financial performance of Intaneft, 2005-2008
Table 2-119 Operational capacity and performance of Agan-Burenie
Table 2-120 Financial performance of Agan-Burenie, 2005-2008
Table 2-121 Operational capacity and performance of Integra’s Drilling, Workover & IPM business-division
Table 2-122 Operational capacity and performance of Integra’ Geophisics business division
Table 2-123 Consolidated financial performance of Integra Group, $ million
Table 2-124 Operational capacity and performance of Neftservisholding
Table 2-125 Operational capacity and performance of PITS Geophizika
Table 2-126 Financial performance of PITS Geofizika, 2005-2007
Table 2-127 Operational capacity and performance of Permenefteotdacha
Table 2-128 Financial performance of Permnefteotdacha, 2005-2008
Table 2-129 Operational capacity and performance of Universal-Service
Table 2-130 Financial performance of Universal Service, 2005-2007
Table 2-131 Operational performance of Ontustik Munaygas
Table 2-132 Operational capacity and performance of South-Eastern Service Group LLP
Table 2-133 Financial performance of FLEK, 2005-2008
Table 2-134 Financial performance of Tsentr Tekhnicheskogo Servisa, 2005-2008
Table 2-135 Financial performance of Servis ÒÒ, 2005-2007
Table 2-136 Financial performance of SPO-Alnas
Table 2-137 Financial performance of UTT Polaznaneft
Table 2-138 Financial performance of PermAvtoTransServis
Table 2-139 Financial performance of Teploservis, 2005-2007
Table 2-140 Operational capacity and performance of Rimera
Table 2-141 Operational capacity of Yuganskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-142 Financial performance of Yuganskneftegazgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-143 Operational capacity and performance of Tomskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-144 Financial performance of Tomskneftegazgeofizika
Table 2-145 Operational performance of Taimyrnefterazvedka
Table 2-146 Financial performance of Taimyrnefterazvedka
Table 2-147 Financial performance of Alnas
Table 2-148 Operational capacity and performance of PolarEx
Table 2-149 Financial performance of PolarEx
Table 2-150 Geography of business operations and major customers of MNP Geodata in 2008-2009
Table 2-151 Operational capacity and performance of MNP Geodata
Table 2-152 Financial performance MNP Geodata
Table 2-153 Operational performance of Urengoineftegasgeologia
Table 2-154 Financial performance of Urengoineftegasgeologia
Table 2-155 Financial performance of Siberian Complex Expedition
Table 2-156 Operational capacity and performance of BKE
Table 2-157 Financial performance of BKE
Table 2-158 Fnancial performance of BKE-Shelf
Table 2-159 Operational capacity of FOSCO
Table 2-160 Operational capacity and performance of L-Burenie
Table 2-161 Financial performance of L-Burenie
Table 2-162 Operational capacity of L-Servis
Table 2-163 Financial performance of L-Servis
Table 2-164 Operational capacity of OTO
Table 2-165 Operational capacity and performance of OTO Recovery
Table 2-166 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgskaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-167 Financial performance of Orenburgskaya Burovaya Kompaniya
Table 2-168 Financial performance of Neftepromburservis, 2005-2008
Table 2-169 Operational capacity and performance of SSK
Table 2-170 Financial performance of SSK
Table 2-171 Geography of business operations and major clients of Tomskburneftegas in 2007 and 2008
Table 2-172 Operational capacity and performance of Tomskburneftegas
Table 2-173 Financial performance of Tomskburneftegas
Table 2-174 Operational capacity and performance of Irkutskgeofizika
Table 2-175 Financial performance of Irkutskgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-176 Operational capacity and performance of Kaliningradgeofizika
Table 2-177 Financial performance of Kaliningradgeofizika
Table 2-178 Operational capacity and performance of Komineftegeofizika
Table 2-179 Financial performance of Komineftegeofizika, 2006-2008
Table 2-180 Operational performance of Krasnodarneftegeofizika
Table 2-181 Financial performance of Krasnodarneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-182 Geography of business operations and major clients of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-183 Operational performance of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-184 Financial performance of Nizhnevartovskneftegeofizika
Table 2-185 Operational capacity and performance of Permneftegeofizika
Table 2-186 Financial performance of Permneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-187 Operational capacity and performance of Samaraneftegeofizika
Table 2-188 Financial performance of Samaraneftegeofizika
Table 2-189 Operational capacity and performance of Saratovneftegeofizika
Table 2-190 Financial performance of Saratovneftegeofizika, 2005-2009
Table 2-191 Clients of Stavropolneftegeofizika in 2008
Table 2-192 Operational capacity and performance of Stavropolneftegeofizika
Table 2-193 Financial performance of Stavropolneftegeofizika, 2005-2009
Table 2-194 Operational capacity and performance of Volgogradneftegeofizika
Table 2-195 Financial performance of Volgogradneftegeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-196 Operational capacity and performance of Yakutskgeofizika
Table 2-197 Financial performance of Yakutskgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-198 Operational capacity and performance of Orenburgneftegeofizika
Table 2-199 Financial performance of Orenburgneftegeofizika
Table 2-200 Operational capacity and performance of Calfrac Well Services in Russia
Table 2-201 Financial performance of CWS in Russia
Table 2-202 Operation capacity of KCA DEUTAG Russia
Table 2-203 Financial performance of KCA DEUTAG Russia, 2005-2008
Table 2-204 Operation performance of KCA DEUTAG Drilling
Table 2-205 Financial performance of KCA DEUTAG Drilling, 2005-2008
Table 2-206 Financial performance of Parker Drilling, 2006-2008
Table 2-207 Financial performance of Parker SMNG Drilling, 2005-2007
Table 2-208 Operational capacity and performance of SGK-Burenie
Table 2-209 Financial performance of SGK-Burenie, 2007 – 2008
Table 2-210 Geography of business and major clients of PetroAliance in 2008
Table 2-211 Operational capacity of PetroAlliance
Table 2-212 Financial performance of PetroAlliance
Table 2-213 Geography of business and major clients of Tyumenpromgeofizika in 2008
Table 2-214 Operational capacity and performance of PGO Tyumenpromgeofizika
Table 2-215 Financial performance of PGO Tyumenpromgeofizika, 2005-2008
Table 2-216 Operational capacity and performance of Newco Well Service
Table 2-217 Financial performance of Newco Well Service in Russia
Feedback
You can ask your question about report or leave your comment in a form below.
* By sending this form you agree with the Privacy policy and Processing of your personal data.
