Oil & Gas Production Refining and Marketing Services & Equipment Transportation & Export Design & EPC Lubricants & Greases Petrochemical Industry
Over the past 20 years, RPI has carried out hundreds of studies on all major segments of the oil and gas industry of Russia, CIS and Eastern Europe.

RPI specialists are permanently in close connect with the industry and monitor its developments closely to provide best-in-class analytics and information support for industry players.
Subscribe to RPIs newsletter:

  

Additional services:
  • Preparing an expanded report tailored to the clients goals and targets
  • Partner search on the market under study
  • Creating an individual presentation
  • Information and research support for the client with a focus on the topic of the report

Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers
Released: June 2010
Language: English, Russian
Quanity: 147 pages
Format: book and CD
Delivery: express shipping (2-4 days)
Price: € 850
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers is unique in a series of research studies covering the lubricants market in Russia.

The report focuses on the bulldozer segment, servicing of which accounts for 6-10% of annual consumption of hydraulic oils in the road construction vehicles segment.

Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers is an in-depth analysis of the most efficient types of hydraulic fluids for bulldozers used as mobile construction equipment, developed according to international standards and characterized by high performance.

The research study examines hydraulic fluids market capacity with segmentation by viscosity and performance. An analysis of the state of the bulldozer market is provided, along with the overall situation in the road construction vehicle segment.

Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers contains:

  • Specifications for lubricants of all leading manufacturers of hydraulic systems and mobile equipment
  • Requirements of international and national standards for the above-mentioned lubricants
  • Comparison of requirements by key parameters
  • Comparison of lubes by the most requested viscosity and operating classes
  • Data on the existing fleet of bulldozers and its place in the structure of advanced highway engineering
  • Information on hydraulic lubricants which are used for advanced road construction equipment and are approved by OEM producers
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Bulldozers alsoanalyzes the competitive environment on the market with a special focus on niches of high commercial potential.

The study is a source of valuable information for:

  • lubricantsproducers
  • lubricantsdealersanddistributors
  • mobileconstructionOEMs
1. Project Overview
1.1 Research Topic
1.2 Research Segmentation
1.3 Research Goal
1.4 Research Timeframe
1.5 Research Method
2. Road Construction Vehicle Fleet
2.1. Bulldozer Segment
2.1.1. Bulldozer Import Dynamics
2.1.2. Domestic Bulldozer Production Dynamics
2.2.3. Bulldozer Market Size Dynamics
2.2.4. Bulldozer Fleet Size
2.2. Overall Road Construction Vehicle Fleet Size
3. Mobile Construction Vehicle Manufacturer Analysis
3.1. Bulldozer Segment
3.1.1. Bulldozer Fleet by Manufacturer
3.1.2. Bulldozer Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic System Volume
3.1.3. Bulldozer Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic Fluid Type
4. Market Capacity
4.1. Total Market Capacity of Lubricants for Hydraulic Vehicles
4.2. Lubricant Segment Capacity Segmented by Lubricant Type
4.3. Lubricant Segment Capacity, Breakdown by Product Type and Construction Vehicle Manufacturer
4.4. The Market Capacity of High Performance Hydraulic Oils in Monetary Terms
4.5. Segment “Bulldozers”
4.5.1. Market Capacity of Oils for Bulldozers
4.5.2. Oil Market Capacity for Bulldozers with Respect to Oils Range Segmentation
5. Competitive Analysis
5.1. CJSC JSOPC Bashneft
5.1.1. Contact Information
5.1.2. Production GeoFigurey
5.1.3. Description of Oil Product Mix for Hydraulic Equipment
5.1.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.2. LLC Gazpromneft – lubricants
5.2.1. Contact Information
5.2.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.2.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.2.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.3. LLC LLK-International
5.3.1. Contact Details
5.3.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.3.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.3.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.4. OJSC NK Rosneft
5.4.1. Contact Information
5.4.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.4.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.4.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.5. OJSC NK Russneft
5.5.1. Contact Information
5.5.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.5.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.5.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.6. LLC TNK lubricants
5.6.1. Contact Information
5.6.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.6.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.6.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.7. OJSC AZMOL
5.7.1. Contact Information
5.7.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.7.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.7.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.8. Castrol
5.8.1. Contact Information
5.8.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.8.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.8.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.9. Chevron global lubricants
5.9.1. Contact Information
5.9.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.9.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.9.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.10. Exxonmobil
5.10.1. Contact Information
5.10.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.10.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.10.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.11. Shell
5.11.1. Contact Information
5.11.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.11.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.11.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.12. Total
5.12.1. Contacts
5.12.2. Manufacturing reach
5.12.3. Line-up of hydraulic fluids
5.12.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
6. Benchmarking Study of Market Segments
6.1. Most promising vehicles from HPHF market capacity perspectives
6.2. Most promising manufacturers from HPHF market capacity analysis
6.3. Market capacity by segments with key manufacturers and their products
6.4. Correspondence of products from lubricants manufacturers with most receptive market segments
7. Market Trends and Outlook
7.1. Factors influencing the absorption capacity of HPHF market
7.2. Prospects for the development / dynamics of changes in the HPHF market capacity
Figure 2.1. Bulldozer imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.2. Russia's domestic bulldozer production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.3. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.4. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Figure 2.5. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Figure 2.6. Russia's bulldozer fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.8 Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Figure 3.1. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent
Figure 3.2. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.3. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 50 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.4. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 50 to 75 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.5. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 75 to 100 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.6. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 100 to 150 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.7. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 150 to 200 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.8. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 200 to 300 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.9. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 300 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.10. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.11. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46 HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.12. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46 HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.13. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68 HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.14. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.15. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM specialty lubricants in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.16 Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST fluids, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.17. Russia's HPHF-applicable bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 2009, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.18. Russia's HPHF-applicable bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, percent of liters
Figure 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of liters
Figure 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 V lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, percent of liters
Figure 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM fluids for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Figure 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Figure 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.20. Market capacity of oils for bulldozers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.23. Market capacity* of 68 HM high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.24. Market capacity* of engine oils for bulldozer hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.25. The market capacity of the engine oils for bulldozer hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Figure 4.26. Market capacity*of high performance OEM oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 7.1 The dynamics of the HPHF market capacity, liters, by the year’s end, 2009-2012.
Table 2.1. Bulldozer imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.2. Russia's domestic bulldozer production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Table 2.3. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.4. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Table 2.5. Russian bulldozer market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Table 2.6. Russia's bulldozer fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.8. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Table 3.1. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.2. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 3.3. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer and hydraulic system volume under 50 liters, pcs.
Table 3.4. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 50 to 75liters, pcs.
Table 3.5. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 75 to 100 liters, pcs.
Table 3.6. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 100 to 150 liters, pcs.
Table 3.7. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 150 to 200 liters, pcs.
Table 3.8. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 200 to 300 liters, pcs.
Table 3.9. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 300 liters, pcs.
Table 3.10. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, pcs.
Table 3.11. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46 HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.12. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in 46 HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.13. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68 HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.14. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.15. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM specialty lubricants in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.16. Russia's bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST fluids, pcs.
Table 3.17. Russia's HPHF-applicable bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by equipment manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.18. Russia's HPHF-applicable bulldozer fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, liters
Table 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, liters
Table 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market * of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 V lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, liters
Table 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM lubricants for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Table 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Table 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.20. Market capacity of oils for bulldozers with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.23. Market capacity* of 68 HM high performance oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.24. Market capacity*of engine oils for bulldozer hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.25. Market capacity engine oils for the hydraulic systems of bulldozers with respect to manufacturers of equipment and oil segments, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.26. Market capacity*of high performance OEM oils for bulldozers with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 6.1. Comparative Product Mixes of Different Companies, 2010
Table 6.2. Demand and Supply Matching on HPHF Market, 2010
Table 7.1. Targets of FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram
Table 7.2. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years
Table 7.3. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years, Updated in 2009
Table 7.4. Extension of Paved Motor Roads, km, 2000-2008
Table 7.5. The Volume of Construction Works in Actual Prices of 2007-2008, million rubles
Table 7.6. Commissioning of Residential and Non-residential Buildings, sq m, 2007-2008
Table 7.7. Investments in Oil Field Surface Facilities, billion rubles, 2010-2015

Feedback

You can ask your question about report or leave your comment in a form below.

* By sending this form you agree with the Privacy policy and Processing of your personal data.



SUBJECT
FULL NAME*
E-MAIL*
PHONE*
COMPANY NAME*
MESSAGE*